Politically Correct
Years ago, in a board meeting for a large humane
organization, I said something like "The dog in the street knows when he
is hungry." A friend suggested I
should say "it" instead of "he." He said that we wouldn't want to anthropomorphize
the dog. In this same vein, some stuffy
scientific types want us to use "that" rather than "who" as
a relative pronoun when referring to animals. My friend in the board meeting was
suggesting it is unscientific to ascribe human feelings and emotions to an
animal by using he, she, his, her or hers.
Well, after a career as an engineer, I'm as scientific as
the next guy, but I admit I think of my dogs as little people. I can tell when they are happy or sad—feel
good or bad—and they can tell the same things about me. Sorry, scientific world, but to me Peachy and
Princess are like my kids, and I'll always think of those two girls as
"she."
People try to manage the language to press their political
points of view. While we used to say
(even though not very grammatically) "everyone has their favorite color,"
it saved us from assigning a gender to "everyone." Some years ago the women's liberation
proponents were fairly successful in getting us to use "his or her"
in place of "their." And they
were pretty effective in doing away with "mankind" instead of using
their preferred "humankind."
I'm sympathetic to this idea of equalizing the sexes. I'll admit I like it lots better than trying
to think of Peachy as an "it."
During my lifetime, we've run through a whole progression of
words for blacks or African Americans.
Use the wrong word and you're sure to insult or hurt feelings. I try to be especially sensitive to this
stricture, and I hope I always will be.
Animal rightists are not above a little language tinkering. They recoil at the word, pet, and insist upon
"companion animal." The idea
is this elevates the status of the animal.
I've tried over the years to use "companion animal," but the
word, pet, keeps working into my writings.
In no way does the awkward, Latinate phrase, companion animal, make my
pet seem better. My pet is something I
love, caress, take care of, and defend.
After a very few humans, there is nothing I love more than my pets.
In one of my recent blogs, I talked about a new dog in our
house as an "acquisition." That drew a comment from a good friend, Diana,
who pointed out that "acquisition" connotes purchase or ownership and
non-human animals deserved better descriptions than that. Diana, thank you; you're absolutely correct,
and my use of the word was insensitive, especially for someone who has had pets
his whole life and tries to be an advocate for animals.
For many years now, I've thought of myself as an animal
rightist, but I've also come to realize that I don't always speak that language
correctly.
Les Inglis